Noosphere as Optimal Control. Part 2. Reflective noosphere

Skip to content [#content] Menu and widgets About the Journal Aim & Scope Editorial Board Publication Ethics Archives For authors Feedback Noosphere as Optimal Control. Part 2. Reflective noosphere Article Open Access by Boris Balter and Marina Faminskaya 1 1 Russian Space Research Institute (Moscow, Russia) 2 Russian State Social University (Moscow, Russia) DOI: http://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/20/5 Received: 25 May 2017 / Accepted: 29 June 2017 / Published: 30 January 2018 View Full-Text Review Reports Cite This Paper Abstract Conceptual system developed in optimal control theory for technical purposes is used as a philosophical instrument applied to cyclic information processes, which are expected to be the basis of noosphere. Noosphere was perceived by the founding fathers of this concept, Vernadsky, Teilhard de Chardin, e.a. as an outgrowth of the evolutionary process, which begins with cosmogenesis and proceeds through geosphere and biosphere. We attempt to apply the optimal control concepts to all three levels – geospheric, biospheric, and noospheric – due to their having a common structure of information processes (or entropic processes considered as proto-information). These processes include homeostasis, accumulation and expenditure of information, formation of hierarchical information structures, evolution involving the breaks of homeostasis etc. In noosphere, controlled system may have the same informational capabilities as controlling system, so that the term “dialog” is more adequate; in this case, we extend optimal control description to game theory. The cyclic, feedback logic of optimal control seems better adapted to noospheric processes than usual causeeffect logic. This second part of the paper proceeds from the geo- and biospheric levels discussed in the first part to the noospheric level. The basic structure at this level is the fusion of natural matter/energy cycles characteristic for geosphere with anthropogenic information cycles, which extend information accumulation and adaptation inherited from biospheric level into reflective realm. The basic type of informational interaction between these structures is construed in perspective of game theory between reflective players. Its essential feature is the interaction between reflective images that each player forms of other players and of oneself. We describe the nontrivial information flows that can arise in a distributed global system of such structures, including complex interactions between collective and individual levels and paradoxes. We analyze the role of science as the carrier of the “rational model”, on which this entire system is based, and the impact on this model of the sociobiological background of science inherited from the biospheric level. We also discuss the role of natural language as an alternative noospheric structure capable of supporting the irrational components of the noosphere. City is discussed as an example of an emerging structure integrating the basic noospheric components, albeit in an inchoate form. Finally, we consider the reflective identities (“I”), which may emerge in noosphere, and the relevant ethical issues. Keywords: optimal control, game theory, reflection, noosphere, information cycles, diachronic, paradoxes. References Axelrod, Robert (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation . Princeton University Press. Balter, Boris, and Marina Faminskaya (2017) Noosphere as Optimal Control. Part 1. Control Theory, Geosphere and Biosphere. Philosophy and Cosmology , Vol. 19, 12-32. Beer, Stafford (1994) The Heart of Enterprise . Wiley, London. Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch (2002) The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology. Cambridge University Press. Dawkins, Richard (2006) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. Eigen, Manfred, and Peter Schuster (1979) The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization. Springer. Fedorov, Nikolai (1990) What Was Man Created for? The Philosophy of the Common Task: Selected Works . London: Honeyglen Publishing. Florensky, Pavel (2000) Letter to V.I. Vernadsky, 1929. In Collected Works in 4 Volumes . Moscow: Nauka. Forrester, Jay (1973) World Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen Press, Inc. Hofstadter, Douglas (1999) Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books. Huberman, Bernardo (2001) The Laws of the Web. Patterns in the Ecology of Information . The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.. Kant, Immanuel (2002) Critique of Practical Reason . Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. Mandelstam, Osip (2012) Conversation about Dante. In Osip Mandelstam. Selected Essays . Austin: University of Texas Press. Moiseev, Nikita (1999) Reflection on the noosphere – humanism in our time. In The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader-Global Environment, Society and Change. London, New York: Routledge. Novikov, Dmitry, and Alexander Chkhartishvili (2014) Reflexion and Control: Mathematical Models. CRC Press. Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (2008) The Phenomenon of Man . New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. Vernadsky, Vladimir (1997) Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon. Moscow: Nongovernmental Ecological V.I. Vernadsky Foundation. Share and Cite Balter, Boris and Marina Faminskaya (2018) Noosphere as Optimal Control. Part 2. Reflective noosphere. Philosophy and Cosmology , Volume 20, 56-73. http://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/20/5 Back to the list of Articles Proudly powered by WordPress