This version of the page http://www.pravojustice.eu/results?page=8 (185.156.41.209) stored by archive.org.ua. It represents a snapshot of the page as of 2021-09-04. The original page over time could change.
Pravo-justice | Results
  • Facebook
  • E-mail
  • All
  • Videos
  • Infographics
  • Reports
  • Presentations

2015-2020 JSRSAP Evaluation Report on Enforcement System

28 August 2020

The Report has been developed as a part of the overall JSRSAP evaluation exercise by Katilin Popov and Maja Grubisin in the capacity of international experts of EU Project Pravo-Justice and Andrii Avtorgov, a national expert to the same project. It is concerned with Area of Intervention Chapter 7 of the JSRSAP: ‘Improving Enforcement System’.

DOWNLOAD

Evaluation of 2015-2020 JSRSAP as Part of the Policy Cycle. Introductory Review

27 August 2020

The evaluation exercise (the Exercise) concerns implementation of Justice Sector Reform Strategy and Action Plan of Ukraine for 2015-2020 (JSRSAP). The Evaluation package consists of 10 reports and the current introductory review.

DOWNLOAD

Visual navigation system for Ukrainian courts

27 May 2020

Model Initiative experts developed a visual navigation guideline for Ukrainian courts.

DOWNLOAD

Disciplinary actions within European self-employed judicial prohessions – an analysis

26 May 2020

The general public has high expectations of those who serve as public officials and the way in which they should conduct themselves in undertaking their duties. One meets those expectations by ensuring conduct above reproach. Historically, the regulation of the legal profession in Europe laid in the hands of courts which controlled the right of self-employed judicial professionals (mainly notaries and lawyers) to practice. The ordinary courts have long since delegated large aspects of regulation to selfemployed legal professions themselves

DOWNLOAD

Analysis of Private Enforcement Officers disciplinary practices

26 May 2020

A number of conclusions on PEO disciplinary liability can be drawn from the relevant information and the so far practice of the current Ukrainian Ministry of Justice (MOJ). It seems that the recent change of administration in that country, within certain political circles, has resulted in somewhat of a shift in the position towards self-employed judicial officers – private enforcement officers of Ukraine (PEOs). It appears that this currently pushed, but not yet wholly adopted PEO policy is based on the idea of safeguarding the monopoly position of the State Enforcement Service (SES), and reducing the significance of PEOs to a rather ornamental position within the Ukrainian judicial system.

DOWNLOAD
  • ← Prev
  • 1
  • ...
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • ...
  • 19
  • Next →
  • ← Prev
  • 8
  • Next →