Anti-Online Gambling Bill gets Negative Feedback

Anti-Online Gambling Bill gets Negative Feedback [index.html] What to look for when shopping for an online casino Finding an Good Online Casino Is it better to gamble in the online casinos or in the land based casinos? A day in the Life of a Casino Dealer What is the Future of Second Life without Gambling? How to get Comps in Casino Online Casinos are safer than the Land Based Casinos Online Casino Gambling - Hassle Free! The State of Online Gambling Second Life Casino Ban Repercussions Are Online Casinos Better then Land Based Casino? Yes! Team PokerNews Announces $250,000 in World Series of Poker Freerolls press release Poker Legend Back on Top of the 'World' Winning $1.6 Million at The Borgata Winter Open/World Poker Tour Main Event Roy Winston Wins $1.5 million in Poker Tournament Betting on sports: Free picks and bonuses . online payday loans . car title cash . mortgage rate . Viagra piller . Cialis Pille . Bonusse fuer Online Casino . no documents paperless low fee no employment verification payday loans . No deposit poker Anti-Online Gambling Bill gets Negative Feedback Two members of America’s House of Representatives have published an editorial in the New York Times stating why regulation of the online casino industry is much preferable to prohibition. Representatives Steve Israel, a Democrat, and Republican Pete King were original co-signers of Barney Frank's Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act (IGREA), House of Representatives Bill 2046. The representatives stated that the Treasury Department is, and should be concerned with a number of jobs, including protecting the President, investigating counterfeit money and tracking terrorist financing and should not be made to look after the ban on online casinos. The Treasury Department is now being asked ‘to spend their time and resources going after something far more trivial, people who play cards from their home computers’, the two Long Island Representatives wrote. The article, Web Gambling: Tax, Don’t Ban, even pointed out that ‘years ago, the Treasury's Secret Service agents used to help Harry Truman put poker games together in the White House. Now they'd be locking him up. Frankly, Federal law-enforcement officials have bigger fish to fry’, the Congressmen affirmed. Frank's Bill would see online gambling licensed and regulated by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and exempt from the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) with players having to pay tax. “Simply taxing web betting would generate significant revenues that could be used for a variety of domestic priorities,” the duo pointed out. As US residents will always find ways to gamble online, Israel and King said that the ban is misdirected and unenforceable and, ironically, leads to an increase in the unprotected environments that UIGEA claimed to address. This is because, the two claim, a bans pushes businesses into the hands of ‘scam artists and grey market entrepreneurs’ based in unregulated offshore locations. The piece ends by saying, ‘In the end, there is the question of how much we want Government to be involved in our private lives. For many, playing poker with friends on the Internet is a way to unwind at the end of the day. Technology aside, web gambling isn't so different than the way Americans have relaxed and enjoyed the company of friends for decades.’ Copyright 2007 mcasinfo.com, Disclaimer notice